Using SmoothGrad (Noise Tunnel) seems to detect more edges of the input image (in comparison with pure IG attribution in [Fig. 1b]), and that can be interpreted as detecting decision boundary. SmoothGrad-Square (Noise Tunnel) and VarGrad (Noise Tunnel) are removing a large amount of noise but usually also some of the important features visible on the attribution from SmoothGrad
M^c(x)=n1Σk=1n{Mc(x+N(0,σ2))}2−{M^c(x)}2
Drawbacks
Even if the Noise Tunnel method improves the accuracy of the XAI methods it adds a large amount of computational overhead
Every sample generated by the method requires the rerun of the whole XAI method
That is a linear increase of computation and to make the method efficient you should use at least 5 generated noise samples