There’s a tradeoff between the energy put into explaining an idea, and the energy needed to understand it.
On one extreme, the explainer can painstakingly craft a beautiful explanation, leading their audience to understanding without even realizing it could have been difficult
On the other extreme, the explainer can do the absolute minimum and abandon their audience to struggle.
That is, really outstanding tutorials, reviews, textbooks, and so on.
we often have a group of researchers all trying to understand each other
Just like before, the cost of explaining stays constant as the group grows, but the cost of understanding increases with each new member
At some size, the effort to understand everyone else becomes too much.
As a defense mechanism, people specialize, focusing on a narrower area of interest.
The maintainable size of the field is controlled by how its members trade off the energy between communicating and understanding.
Research Debt is the accumulation of missing interpretive labor.
It’s extremely natural for young ideas to go through a stage of debt, like early prototypes in engineering.
The problem is that we often stop at that point.
Young ideas aren’t ending points for us to put in a paper and abandon.
When we let things stop there the debt piles up.
It becomes harder to understand and build on each other’s work and the field fragments.